We all evolved from single-celled organisms. Now we have different types of cells that build different organs, which perform various functions in our body. Clearly, we have come far and we can see that organisms have become more complex. Following this trend, we might also claim that evolution leads to sophistication and hence specialization.

Similarly, we have noticed architects trying their best to make something look more interesting by adding design elements such as horizontal or diagonal lines, weird curves etc. Why? Because, without complexity, it is too simple! And if it is too simple, it may mean that it probably isn’t well thought of. Although we admit that this fear is well-grounded, the approach is definitely not!

Let’s see how nature deals with this dilemma. Even amongst complex organisms with well-defined organs, we humans have emerged distinctly with a neural network unparalleled by any other organism we know of. But even though nature might seem to prefer sophistication, it has not forgotten simplicity. Unicellular organisms co-exist with us! And they seem to not have changed much! This is a great example to see that for any change, there must be a purpose.

“If Complexity/Specialization does not offer any advantage, there is no purpose for its existence”

Unicellular organisms have no advantage by evolving complexity as their adaptations are well-suited for their environment. The universe does not prefer Simplicity or Complexity. It is the perception of the environment by the organism which defines the adoption of which of the above would help it survive.

In Architecture, while facing limitations, it is always better to use the available resources to solve a problem (Simplicity). Then, only after prioritizing client needs and style preference, should one ideally propose any additions (Complexity). But, this can only happen by critically examining all decisions to be made wrt to the environment or what we like to call the Context. We will discuss this next.